lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:48:32 +0300 From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, mugunthanvnm@...com, grygorii.strashko@...com Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dlide@...com, Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org> Subject: [PATCH v2 02/14] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: remove redundant check in napi poll No need to check number of handled packets, when in most cases (> 99%) it's not 0. It can be 0 only in rare cases, even in this case it's not bad to print just 0. Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org> --- drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c index 8972bf6..85ee9f5 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c @@ -793,9 +793,7 @@ static int cpsw_tx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_tx, int budget) } } - if (num_tx) - cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d tx pkts\n", num_tx); - + cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d tx pkts\n", num_tx); return num_tx; } @@ -814,9 +812,7 @@ static int cpsw_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_rx, int budget) } } - if (num_rx) - cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d rx pkts\n", num_rx); - + cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d rx pkts\n", num_rx); return num_rx; } -- 1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists