[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:09:24 +0100
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...prog.at>
CC: <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: arizona: Remove pointless switch case
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 07:41:13PM +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 16:58 +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> [...]
> > case IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING:
> > case IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING:
> > break;
> > -
> > - case IRQ_TYPE_NONE:
> > default:
>
> Don't know about the kernels coding rule in that case but personally, I
> use that style to explicit list all enum/#define values so that it is
> obvious that none was forgotten.
> For the compiler output, it shouldn't matter anyways ...
>
I don't have any objection to dropping the patch as you say will
generate the same output either way.
Thanks,
Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists