[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160808131930.GB9357@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:19:30 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: Strange behavior of perf top with PEBS
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 03:03:43PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:23:20PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:30:32PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 08/04/2016 06:29 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 02:30:46PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > > [SNIP]
> > > >
> > > > sorry for late response..
> > > >
> > > > I checked on f22 kernel and it's missing the core2 PEBs fix:
> > > > 1424a09a9e18 perf/x86: fix PEBS issues on Intel Atom/Core2
> > > >
> > > > which was introduced in 4.5.. you should upgrade or include
> > > > this patch
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the reply. Isn't this supposed to be tagged as stable since
> > > it essentially breaks the default invocation of perf top?
> >
> > yep, it seems like good one to have in stable, Peter?
>
> Greg, could you pick:
>
> 1424a09a9e18 ("perf/x86: fix PEBS issues on Intel Atom/Core2")
>
> Into 4.4-stable ?
Now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists