[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160808180212.122868810@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 21:11:24 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 49/68] sched/fair: Fix effective_load() to consistently use smoothed load
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
commit 7dd4912594daf769a46744848b05bd5bc6d62469 upstream.
Starting with the following commit:
fde7d22e01aa ("sched/fair: Fix overly small weight for interactive group entities")
calc_tg_weight() doesn't compute the right value as expected by effective_load().
The difference is in the 'correction' term. In order to ensure \Sum
rw_j >= rw_i we cannot use tg->load_avg directly, since that might be
lagging a correction on the current cfs_rq->avg.load_avg value.
Therefore we use tg->load_avg - cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib +
cfs_rq->avg.load_avg.
Now, per the referenced commit, calc_tg_weight() doesn't use
cfs_rq->avg.load_avg, as is later used in @w, but uses
cfs_rq->load.weight instead.
So stop using calc_tg_weight() and do it explicitly.
The effects of this bug are wake_affine() making randomly
poor choices in cgroup-intense workloads.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Fixes: fde7d22e01aa ("sched/fair: Fix overly small weight for interactive group entities")
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -687,8 +687,6 @@ void init_entity_runnable_average(struct
/* when this task enqueue'ed, it will contribute to its cfs_rq's load_avg */
}
-static inline unsigned long cfs_rq_runnable_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
-static inline unsigned long cfs_rq_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
#else
void init_entity_runnable_average(struct sched_entity *se)
{
@@ -4594,19 +4592,24 @@ static long effective_load(struct task_g
return wl;
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
- long w, W;
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = se->my_q;
+ long W, w = cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq);
- tg = se->my_q->tg;
+ tg = cfs_rq->tg;
/*
* W = @wg + \Sum rw_j
*/
- W = wg + calc_tg_weight(tg, se->my_q);
+ W = wg + atomic_long_read(&tg->load_avg);
+
+ /* Ensure \Sum rw_j >= rw_i */
+ W -= cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib;
+ W += w;
/*
* w = rw_i + @wl
*/
- w = cfs_rq_load_avg(se->my_q) + wl;
+ w += wl;
/*
* wl = S * s'_i; see (2)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists