[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160808191701.GH511@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 21:17:01 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ville Syrj??l?? <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/hweight: Don't clobber %rdi
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 08:53:16PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Ville's patch is the proper thing to do; I still think the comments
> probably should be removed as they might provide more confusion than help,
> but that's a separate discussion.
Right, so while trying to debug this with a pen and paper, I found that
adding a subsript to the w variable makes it more understandable. I.e.,
something like this:
w_1 -= (w >> 1) & 0x55555555;
w_2 = (w_1 & 0x33333333) + ((w_1 >> 2) & 0x33333333);
and then you'd have
movl %eax, %edx # w
shrl %edx # w >>= 1
andl $0x55555555, %edx # (w >> 1) & 0x55555555
subl %edx, %eax # w_1 = w - ...
movl %eax, %edx # w_1
shrl $2, %eax # w_1 >>= 2
andl $0x33333333, %edx # (w_1 >> 2) & 0x33333333
andl $0x33333333, %eax # w_1 &= 0x33333333
addl %edx, %eax # w_2 = ... + ...
...
Anyway, something like that. I find that more readable TBH.
Thanks and thanks for confirming Ville's patch fixes it on your box.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists