[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <57A9C9D7020000780010426B@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 04:17:27 -0600
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "David Vrabel" <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"Juergen Gross" <JGross@...e.com>
Cc: "xen-devel" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] xenbus: prefer list_for_each()
This is more efficient than list_for_each_safe() when list modification
is accompanied by breaking out of the loop.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
---
v2: Avoid commit message to continue from subject.
---
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- 4.8-rc1/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c
+++ 4.8-rc1-xen-xenbus-dev-list_for_each/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ out:
static int xenbus_write_watch(unsigned msg_type, struct xenbus_file_priv *u)
{
- struct watch_adapter *watch, *tmp_watch;
+ struct watch_adapter *watch;
char *path, *token;
int err, rc;
LIST_HEAD(staging_q);
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int xenbus_write_watch(unsigned m
}
list_add(&watch->list, &u->watches);
} else {
- list_for_each_entry_safe(watch, tmp_watch, &u->watches, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(watch, &u->watches, list) {
if (!strcmp(watch->token, token) &&
!strcmp(watch->watch.node, path)) {
unregister_xenbus_watch(&watch->watch);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists