lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160809135108.GA28109@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Aug 2016 15:51:08 +0200
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	robert.foss@...labora.com
Cc:	oneukum@...e.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Chan <benchan@...omium.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>,
	Prathmesh Prabhu <pprabhu@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PACTH v2] cdc-wdm: Clear read pipeline in case of error

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 11:48:52AM -0400, robert.foss@...labora.com wrote:
> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
> 
> Implemented queued response handling. This queue is processed every time the
> WDM_READ flag is cleared.
> 
> In case of a read error, userspace may not actually read the data, since the
> driver returns an error through wdm_poll. After this, the underlying device may
> attempt to send us more data, but the queue is not processed. While userspace is
> also blocked, because the read error is never cleared.
> 
> After this patch, we proactively process the queue on a read error. If there was
> an outstanding response to handle, that will clear the error (or go through the
> same logic again, if another read error occurs). If there was no outstanding
> response, this will bring the queue size back to 0, unblocking a future response
> from the underlying device.
> 
> Tested-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
> Acked-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Only set a new error code it there is no previous error code

This no longer applies to my tree due to a patch sent before yours for
the same driver.  Can you resync against my usb-testing brance on my
usb.git tree on git.kernel.org and resend?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ