[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1470751377.2881.137.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 10:02:57 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: "'Thiago Jung Bauermann'" <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ima: on soft reboot, restore the measurement list
On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 13:35 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> Also why '__packed' - guarantees sub-optimal code generation.
> Much better to include explicit padding to align everything.
This patch set does not define a new format, but piggy backs on top of
the existing <securityfs>/ima/binary_runtime_measurements list. The
prefixed buffer header includes a version, so that if in the future we
need to modify the format, we would be able to.
In terms of the prefixed header, how would you define the fields:
version, buffer size, number of measurements?
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists