[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOxpaSURw02TruZH8n1vX0RQ-CD2RroSZPV7pTivKaHgPy4xtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:45:06 -0600
From: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...il.com>
To: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@...il.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [fs] 6141b4d642: xfstests.generic.079.fail
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Eryu Guan <guaneryu@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:14:38PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>>
>> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus
>> commit 6141b4d64295ec08a1b48c7fcac8a566658cd64f ("fs: return EPERM on immutable inode")
>>
>> in testcase: xfstests
>> with following parameters:
>>
>> disk: 4HDD
>> fs: btrfs
>> test: generic-quick1
>>
>>
>> on test machine: 4 threads Sandy Bridge with 6G memory
>>
>> caused below changes:
>
> I think generic/079 needs update, because the expected errno was changed
> after this commit. I've sent a patch to fstests@...r.kernel.org.
Eryu,
I was bisecting the issue with generic/079 today as well, and your
patch to xfstests solves the issue for me.
You can add:
Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
to the xfstests patch. Sorry I couldn't reply to your patch directly,
I wasn't previously subscribed to the fstests list. I found it on
patchwork:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9270909/
- Ross
Powered by blists - more mailing lists