lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160809165830.GA19353@nazgul.tnic>
Date:	Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:58:30 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	york sun <york.sun@....com>
Cc:	"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	"morbidrsa@...il.com" <morbidrsa@...il.com>,
	"oss@...error.net" <oss@...error.net>,
	Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>,
	Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 03/11] driver/edac/mpc85xx_edac: Drop setting/clearing
 RFXE bit in HID1

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:40:44PM +0000, york sun wrote:
> I want to add this, normally uncorrectable errors don't trigger machine 
> check on e500v1. RXFE controls different interrupt on e500v2. e500mc 
> doesn't support RXFE. Together with the reason I explained, I believe 
> EDAC driver shouldn't change RXFE.
> 
> I hope I made it clear.

Yes, you did, thanks. I reread Scott's previous mail too and yes, it
doesn't make a whole lotta sense to touch the RXFE bit in EDAC. I'm
assuming firmware leaves it cleared coming out of reset so we're all
good.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ