linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] ima: carry the measurement list across kexec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <91fa2f95-4d70-a056-d599-01cb3bbe6771@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Aug 2016 15:19:31 +1000
From:	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ima: carry the measurement list across kexec



On 04/08/16 22:24, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> The TPM PCRs are only reset on a hard reboot.  In order to validate a
> TPM's quote after a soft reboot (eg. kexec -e), the IMA measurement list
> of the running kernel must be saved and then restored on the subsequent
> boot.
> 
> The existing securityfs binary_runtime_measurements file conveniently
> provides a serialized format of the IMA measurement list. This patch
> set serializes the measurement list in this format and restores it.
> 
> This patch set pre-req's Thiago Bauermann's "kexec_file: Add buffer
> hand-over for the next kernel" patch set* for actually carrying the
> serialized measurement list across the kexec.
> 
> Mimi
> 

Hi, Mimi

I am trying to convince myself of the security of the solution. I asked
Thiago as well, but may be I am be lagging behind in understanding.

We trust the kernel to hand over PCR values of the old kernel (which
cannot be validated) to the IMA subsystem in the new kernel for storage.
I guess the idea is for ima_add_boot_aggregate to do the right thing?
How do we validate what the old kernel is giving us? Why do we care for
the old measurement list? Is it still of significance in the new kernel?


Balbir Singh.