[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK3bHNUL3NjFFex4US09ZnxvKV-1oJAu=qVrZUSgeKy90CBiAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:41:05 -0400
From: Abylay Ospan <aospan@...up.ru>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa-dev@...g-engineering.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Kozlov <serjk@...up.ru>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] media: pci: netup_unidvb: don't print error when
adding adapter fails
yes, you right. If we remove this message there is no big problem. But
if we do not remove this it's also ok, right ? What the big deal to
remove this type of messages (i'm just interested) ?
For me it's ok to remove:
Acked-by: Abylay Ospan <aospan@...up.ru>
2016-08-09 10:58 GMT-04:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>:
>
>> Sometimes it better to show more message - especially in error conditions :)
>
> Sure, if they contain additional information.
>
>> btw, do you make sanity check for "duplicate" log messages ?
>
> I checked all error messages if they contain additional information.
>
>> ret = i2c_add_adapter(&i2c->adap);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - dev_err(&ndev->pci_dev->dev,
>> - "%s(): failed to add I2C adapter\n", __func__);
>> + if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> - }
>
> IMHO, this one doesn't. __func__ is not helpful to users. And the error
> messages in the core will make sure that a developer knows where to
> start looking.
>
--
Abylay Ospan,
NetUP Inc.
http://www.netup.tv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists