linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq / sched: Rework of cpufreq_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4498725.ix9jPCHteg@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 02:43 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq / sched: Rework of cpufreq_update_util() arguments

Hi,

There were some comments on the "cpufreq / sched: cpufreq_update_util() flags
and iowait boosting" series I sent some time ago and I wanted to address them,
but for this purpose I had to combine patches [1-2,4/7] from that series
into one and make some changes on top of that.

Then I thought it would be better to send that separately from the iowait
boost part of that series, so here it goes.

[1/2] Removes the util and max args from cpufreq_update_util() and governor
      callbacks and adds a flags argument instead of them.  That argument
      is then used to handle RT and DL in schedutil and the utilization data
      are accessed by it directly (so it is non-modular now to avoid exporting
      the scheduler internals to modules).
[2/2] Replaces the time argument of cpufreq_update_util() with an rq pointer
      which allows some simplifications to be made.

There should be no changes in behavior as a result of this.

Thanks,
Rafael