[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160810145206.GA17734@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:52:06 -0600
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] radix-tree: 'slot' can be NULL in
radix_tree_next_slot()
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 09:29:23AM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Ross Zwisler
> <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:21:39PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > <>
> >> NAK. This is fast path and it's already bloated.
> >> I want to revert most changes here and rework "multiorder" entries.
> >>
> >> Here you can find almost ready patchset for that
> >> https://github.com/koct9i/linux/commits/radix-tree
> >
> > Okay...are you okay with the second 2 patches in the series? They stand
> > alone, and I believe are both good to have.
>
> They looks good.
Cool, can I interpret that as an Acked-by for my v2? :)
> If you're worried about complicated paths - I'll add comment for
> *_next_slot() about that.
Yea, if we can document the exact ways in which we're protected from not
dereferencing a NULL 'slot', that would be great. I think it essentially
boils down to:
1) For tagged iteration, if 'slot' is NULL then iter->tags must be cleared
2) For non-tagged iteration, it 'slot' is NULL then
radix_tree_chunk_size(iter) must return 1 or less.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists