[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhR=uX-h+gavdWbntojzKr4wF6LUfnHr9z1pOjT69H=uRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:32:48 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, Dan Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>,
Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
>> Okay, I just merged these patches into selinux#next. With the
>> exception of some changes to restore the mode argument to
>> ovl_create_or_link() and to fix some whitespace damage the patches
>> were merged cleanly.
>
> Don't need to add the back the mode argument, just use stat->mode.
Thanks for the pointer (I'm on vacation at the moment and trying to do
this quickly). Since it was a merge issue, and the branch hasn't been
pulled by Linus, I didn't bother with a new patch, I simply updated
the existing patch from Vivek and re-pushed to selinux#next. If you
see anything else, please let me know.
For Fedora folks, I'm currently rebuilding the COPR
pcmoore/kernel-secnext kernel packages with this update; assuming
there are no problems with the COPR infrastructure the kernel should
be ready in a couple of hours.
* https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pcmoore/kernel-secnext
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists