[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160810030254.GD1879@shlinux2>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:02:54 +0800
From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>
To: Joshua Clayton <stillcompiling@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
broonie@...nel.org, sre@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, dbaryshkov@...il.com, dwmw3@...radead.org,
k.kozlowski@...sung.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
mail@...iej.szmigiero.name, troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com,
festevam@...il.com, oscar@...andei.net, stephen.boyd@...aro.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mka@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] ARM: dts: imx6qdl-udoo.dtsi: fix onboard USB HUB
property
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:33:35PM -0700, Joshua Clayton wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 08/08/2016 01:52 AM, Peter Chen wrote:
> > The current dts describes USB HUB's property at USB controller's
> > entry, it is improper. The USB HUB should be the child node
> > under USB controller, and power sequence properties are under
> > it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-udoo.dtsi | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-udoo.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-udoo.dtsi
> > index 3bee2f9..f29a72c2f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-udoo.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-udoo.dtsi
> > @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> > *
> > */
> >
> > +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > +
> > / {
> > aliases {
> > backlight = &backlight;
> > @@ -58,17 +60,6 @@
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> >
> > - reg_usb_h1_vbus: regulator@0 {
> > - compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > - reg = <0>;
> > - regulator-name = "usb_h1_vbus";
> > - regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> > - regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> > - enable-active-high;
> > - startup-delay-us = <2>; /* USB2415 requires a POR of 1 us minimum */
> > - gpio = <&gpio7 12 0>;
> > - };
> > -
> > reg_panel: regulator@1 {
> > compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > reg = <1>;
> > @@ -259,9 +250,18 @@
> > &usbh1 {
> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_usbh>;
> > - vbus-supply = <®_usb_h1_vbus>;
> > - clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_CKO>;
> > status = "okay";
> > +
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> Assuming they are needed,
> #address-cells and #size-cells should go in imx6qdl.dtsi,
> rather than in board dts files, shouldn't they?
Yes, you are right. All imx USB controller has only one port.
> > + usb2415: hub@1 {
> > + compatible = "usb424,2514";
> > + reg = <1>;
> Does <reg> have any effect?
> I couldn't find any reference to it in the patches.
> (so apologies if it is in core code)
> Does it matter?
Please see 69bec7259853 ("USB: core: let USB device know device node")
for detail.
> Would it be possible to connect
> more than one hub to the same usb phy?
No possible for current imx, but possible for other SoCs.
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists