linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:53:42 +0100
From:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	mark.rutland@....com, linux@....linux.org.uk, sudeep.holla@....com,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
	will.deacon@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
	dietmar.eggemann@....com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous
 systems

Hi,

On 19/07/16 13:40, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> version 6 of "CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems" patchset [1]
> (please refer to previous postings to get some context).
> 

gentle ping to everybody participating in this discussion.

Rob acked the bindings and Peter seems fine with this set as well. Given
that no major problems with the current implementation where pointed out
in v5 (and the minor ones I should have addressed in v6), do people
think it might be time to merge this set? If you think the set is fine
it would be good to collect more ACKs, I guess; if not please provide
feedback so that I can address it before the next cycle.

Thanks!

Best,

- Juri