[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1608102358320.22028@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 23:59:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [Resend][PATCH] x86/power/64: Always create temporary identity
mapping correctly
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> So I used your .config to generate one for my test machine and with
> that I can reproduce.
Was that the config I've sent, or did Boris provide one as well? Which one
are you able to reproduce with please?
> The hardware configuration doesn't matter, then, the issue is config-related.
How big is the diff between the two configs? Could you please share it?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists