linux-kernel - Re: [Resend][PATCH] x86/power/64: Always create temporary identity mapping correctly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 23:59:32 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [Resend][PATCH] x86/power/64: Always create temporary identity
 mapping correctly

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> So I used your .config to generate one for my test machine and with
> that I can reproduce.

Was that the config I've sent, or did Boris provide one as well? Which one 
are you able to reproduce with please?

> The hardware configuration doesn't matter, then, the issue is config-related.

How big is the diff between the two configs? Could you please share it?

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs