linux-kernel - Re: [Regression] "irqdomain: Don't set type when mapping an IRQ" breaks nexus7 gpio buttons

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZHz5KZLWDvJgp6ajioh7Za3fmdYxE7W60gUMBEZDjmcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:14:30 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression] "irqdomain: Don't set type when mapping an IRQ"
 breaks nexus7 gpio buttons

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> wrote:

> Guess what, I just found this exact sucker in the pile of
> "junk we won't ever use because it can't run mainline".
> I even booted one of your test images on it.
>
> Do you have a tree I can clone directly, with all the ugly patches
> applied?

Yeah:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-integrator.git/log/?h=apq8060-dragonboard-ethernet

The apq8060-dragonboard branch is clean (just necessary boot fixes,
the flag fixes and the revert), gives the right IRQs:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-integrator.git/log/?h=apq8060-dragonboard

The webpage gives the details of how I build, my Makefile and
initramfs.cpio etc if you want:
https://dflund.se/~triad/krad/dragonboard/

>>> Do you see this symptom on all chained interrupts? Or just this
>>> particular one?
>>
>> This appears on all IRQs on the PM (MFD) ASIC.
>
> These interrupts?
>
> 197:          1          0    pm8xxx  50 Edge      pmic8xxx_pwrkey_release
> 198:          1          0    pm8xxx  51 Edge      pmic8xxx_pwrkey_press
> 199:          8          0    pm8xxx  74 Edge      pmic-keypad
> 200:          0          0    pm8xxx  75 Edge      pmic-keypad-stuck
> 201:          0          0    pm8xxx  39 Edge      pm8xxx_rtc_alarm

Yes. Doesn' appear anymore in v4.8-rc1

> How is the interrupt topology built? pm8085 -> tlmm -> GIC?

Yes AFAICT.

pm8058 -> tlmm hwirq 88 -> GIC hwirq 16

Yours,
Linus Walleij