[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1470908028-8596-6-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:33:39 +0800
From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@...il.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@...wei.com>,
"Tianhong Ding" <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 05/14] arm64/numa: avoid inconsistent information to be printed
numa_init(of_numa_init) may returned error because of numa configuration
error. So "No NUMA configuration found" is inaccurate. In fact, specific
configuration error information should be immediately printed by the
testing branch.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
---
arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
index c7fe3ec..fe26ed9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
@@ -333,8 +333,10 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- if (nodes_empty(numa_nodes_parsed))
+ if (nodes_empty(numa_nodes_parsed)) {
+ pr_info("No NUMA configuration found\n");
return -EINVAL;
+ }
ret = numa_register_nodes();
if (ret < 0)
@@ -365,8 +367,6 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
if (numa_off)
pr_info("NUMA disabled\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */
- else
- pr_info("No NUMA configuration found\n");
pr_info("NUMA: Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1);
--
2.5.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists