linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 18:22:03 +0800
From:	Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
To:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc:	Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	rruigrok@...eaurora.org, harba@...eaurora.org,
	Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
	G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
	wei@...hat.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
	Leo Duran <leo.duran@....com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT
 support in arm_arch_timer

Hi Hanjun, Tomasz,

On 11 August 2016 at 18:15, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2016/8/11 17:37, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>>
>> Hi Fu,
>>
>> Do you mind if I send IORT series where new drivers/acpi/arm64 directory
>> would be introduced in first place ? This means your GTDT set would
>> depend on IORT.
>
>
> I think it's reasonable as the IORT for ITS is the key device enablement
> for PCI MSI. I talked to Fuwei offline and he is fine with it.

That's no problem at all, will do.

Can I do this:
(1)apply Tomasz's v8 patchset on the master branch of upstream kernel
(2)rebase my v10 on the top of Tomasz's v8
(3)git format-patch as v11, repost it

Is that OK for everyone? :-)

>
> But both the GTDT patchset and IORT are in good shape now, can we
> targeting both of them for 4.9 kernel (since all go via tip tree)?
>
> Thanks
> Hanjun



-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat