lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 12:45:18 +0100
From:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression] "irqdomain: Don't set type when mapping an IRQ"
 breaks nexus7 gpio buttons

On 11/08/16 10:47, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 11/08/16 09:37, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 08/08/16 22:48, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 1:45 AM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @@ -614,7 +615,11 @@ unsigned int irq_create_fwspec_mapping(struct
>>>> irq_fwspec *fwspec)
>>>>                  * it now and return the interrupt number.
>>>>                  */
>>>>                 if (irq_get_trigger_type(virq) == IRQ_TYPE_NONE) {
>>>> -                       irq_set_irq_type(virq, type);
>>>> +                       irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
>>>> +                       if (!irq_data)
>>>> +                               return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +                       irqd_set_trigger_type(irq_data, type);
>>>>                         return virq;
>>>>                 }
>>>>
>>>> If I revert just that, it works again.
>>>
>>> This makes my platform work too.
>>> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>>
>> Hmmm. I'm now booting your kernel on the APQ8060, and reverting this
>> hunk doesn't fix it for me. I'm confused...
>>
>> The interesting part is this:
>> 109:     100000          0   msmgpio  88 Level     (null)
> 
> 88 is the pm8058 parent interrupt and so I am surprised you would even
> see this in /proc/interrupts as it should be a chained interrupt, right?

That's because it repeatedly fires without a proper handler, and only
appears then.

> Are you seeing this with all the ethernet updates for the APQ8060 in
> Linus' branch? I am curious what you see with stock v4.8-rc1 and if
> interrupts work ok with the change I had proposed. Hard to tell if there
> is more than one issue here.

(mostly) stock v4.8-rc1 exhibits the same issue, and your fix doesn't
help this particular issue. Reverting your fix *and* applying the above
revert makes it work again. Which is just papering over the issue, as it
only does something when the interrupt is seen for a second time.

I must be missing something obvious...

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ