[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160811083652.55371952@lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 08:36:52 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] doc: dma-buf: sphinx conversion and cleanup
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:17:56 +0530
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org> wrote:
> Convert dma-buf documentation over to sphinx; also cleanup to
> address sphinx warnings.
>
> While at that, convert dma-buf-sharing.txt as well, and make it the
> dma-buf API guide.
Thanks for working to improve the documentation! I do have a few overall
comments...
- The two comment fixes are a separate thing that should go straight to
the dma-buf maintainer, who is ... <looks> ... evidently somebody
familiar to you :) I assume you'll merge those two directly?
- It looks like you create a new RST document but leave the old one in
place. Having two copies of the document around can only lead to
confusion, so I think the old one should go.
- I really wonder if we want to start carving pieces out of
device-drivers.tmpl in this way. I guess I would rather see the
conversion of that book and the better integration of the other docs
*into* it. One of the goals of this whole thing is to unify our
documentation, not to reinforce the silos.
Does that make sense?
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists