[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160811150601.GE2478@joana>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 12:06:01 -0300
From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@...el.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] staging/android: remove doc from sw_sync
Hi Pavel,
2016-08-09 Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>:
> On Mon 2016-08-08 18:24:17, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
> >
> > SW_SYNC should never be used by other pieces of the kernel apart from
> > sync_debug as it is only a Sync File Validation Framework, so hide any
> > info to avoid confuse this with a standard kernel internal API.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
>
> NAK.
>
> It is unclear for what the code does, removing the docs is not going to help.
>
> If it should not be used, document that it should not be used.. but not remove
> the docs.
Okay, I'll skip this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists