linux-kernel - Re: [LKP] [lkp] [xfs] 68a9f5e700: aim7.jobs-per-min -13.6% regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Aug 2016 20:02:08 +1000
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [xfs] 68a9f5e700: aim7.jobs-per-min -13.6% regression

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 04:51:24PM +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> On 08/12, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> >On 08/12, Dave Chinner wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >>lkp-folk: the patch I've just tested it attached below - can you
> >>feed that through your test and see if it fixes the regression?
> >>
> >
> >Hi, Dave
> >
> >I am verifying your fix patch in lkp environment now, will send the
> >result once I get it.
> >
> 
> Here is the test result.

Which says "no change". Oh well, back to the drawing board...

Can you send me the aim7 config file and command line you are using
for the test?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com