[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160812012601.GO19025@dastard>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:26:01 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [xfs] 68a9f5e700: aim7.jobs-per-min -13.6% regression
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:16:12AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 05:33:20PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
> We need to know what is happening that is different - there's a good
> chance the mapping trace events will tell us. Huang, can you get
> a raw event trace from the test?
>
> I need to see these events:
>
> xfs_file*
> xfs_iomap*
> xfs_get_block*
>
lkp-folks, can I please get these traces run and sent to me? I don't
have the time or patience to try to get aim7 running on my machines
- the build is full of hard-coded paths and libraries that aren't
provided by modern distros (e.g. it requires a static libaio.a!) and
it fails at the configure stage complaining that:
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
Which is a complete load of BS.
Hence I can't make progress until I have some way of understanding
what the IO pattern is that is generating the profile being
measured. So far I'm unable to do that with any of the tools I been
trying, hence I need the traces to work out what I'm missing...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists