[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72a2d7ef-54c9-a2dd-c83a-bf994b3005ce@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:49:23 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: clabbe.montjoie@...il.com, ohad@...ery.com,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org
Cc: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH RFC 3/3] ARM: dts: sun8i: add hwspinlock
device to sun8i-h3
Hi,
On 12-08-16 13:46, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> Add the hwspinlock device tree node for the device present on H3.
>
> Signed-off-by: LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
> index 439e8ed..c801389 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
> @@ -489,6 +489,16 @@
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> + hwspinlock: hwspinlock@...8000 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-hwspinlock";
> + reg = <0x01c18000 0x400>;
> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_SPINLOCK>;
> + reset-names = "ahb";
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_SPINLOCK>;
> + clock-names = "ahb";
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> gic: interrupt-controller@...81000 {
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-gic", "arm,cortex-a15-gic";
> reg = <0x01c81000 0x1000>,
>
Why status=disabled? If this is a core part of the SoC, which Linux
can use, then IMHO it should be always enabled, like e.g. we also
always enable the timers.
Regards,
Habs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists