[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160812183448.GA32059@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:34:49 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-binding: remoteproc: Document generic properties
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:37:02AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> This documents the generic properties "rprocs" and "rproc-names", used
> for consumer drivers to reference a remoteproc node.
How do you intend to use this? I wonder if it would not be better to
expose a remote proc with existing bindings for a particular purpose
(e.g. clocks, resets, etc.) rather than a generic connection. The client
side would have to have specific knowledge as to what functions the
remote proc provides.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists