[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fdffed8e-d269-6519-437e-6f731dbb9c05@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:31:01 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, jayamohan.kallickal@...gotech.com,
jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ketan.mukadam@...gotech.com,
sony.john@...gotech.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3] be2iscsi: Fix some error messages
Le 13/08/2016 à 13:35, Joe Perches a écrit :
>
>> @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int beiscsi_eh_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *sc)
>> &nonemb_cmd.dma);
>> if (nonemb_cmd.va == NULL) {
>> beiscsi_log(phba, KERN_ERR, BEISCSI_LOG_EH,
>> - "BM_%d : Failed to allocate memory for"
>> + "BM_%d : Failed to allocate memory for "
>> "mgmt_invalidate_icds\n");
> doesn't match commit log as no coalescing/concatenation
> is done.
>
> There are many of these.
>
I have *only* fixed the one reported by checkpatch and left the others
unchanged.
My initial proposal was to fix incorrect strings, without modifying too
much the code. So I decided to do the minimum of changes.
Should I resubmitted with:
- all strings *in the patch* concatenated?
- all strings *in the file*" concatenated?
CJ
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists