lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 13 Aug 2016 10:16:03 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc:	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] x86: Rewrite switch_to()

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
> This patch set simplifies the switch_to() code, by moving the stack switch
> code out of line into an asm stub before calling __switch_to().  This ends
> up being more readable, and using the C calling convention instead of
> clobbering all registers improves code generation.  It also allows newly
> forked processes to construct a special stack frame to seamlessly flow
> to ret_from_fork, instead of using a test and branch, or an unbalanced
> call/ret.

Do you have performance numbers? Is it noticeable/measurable?

             Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ