linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 071/305] perf tools: Fix perf regs mask generation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 13 Aug 2016 18:42:51 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Michael Ellerman" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 071/305] perf tools: Fix perf regs mask generation

3.16.37-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit f47822078dece7189cad0a5f472f148e5e916736 upstream.

On some architectures (powerpc in particular), the number of registers
exceeds what can be represented in an integer bitmask. Ensure we
generate the proper bitmask on such platforms.

Fixes: 71ad0f5e4 ("perf tools: Support for DWARF CFI unwinding on post processing")
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -7,18 +7,18 @@ int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct reg
 	int i, idx = 0;
 	u64 mask = regs->mask;
 
-	if (regs->cache_mask & (1 << id))
+	if (regs->cache_mask & (1ULL << id))
 		goto out;
 
-	if (!(mask & (1 << id)))
+	if (!(mask & (1ULL << id)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < id; i++) {
-		if (mask & (1 << i))
+		if (mask & (1ULL << i))
 			idx++;
 	}
 
-	regs->cache_mask |= (1 << id);
+	regs->cache_mask |= (1ULL << id);
 	regs->cache_regs[id] = regs->regs[idx];
 
 out: