linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.14 29/29] ext4: fix reference counting bug on block allocation error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 14 Aug 2016 22:07:57 +0200
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 29/29] ext4: fix reference counting bug on block allocation error

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>

commit 554a5ccc4e4a20c5f3ec859de0842db4b4b9c77e upstream.

If we hit this error when mounted with errors=continue or
errors=remount-ro:

    EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used:2940: comm ext4.exe: Allocating blocks 5090-6081 which overlap fs metadata

then ext4_mb_new_blocks() will call ext4_mb_release_context() and try to
continue. However, ext4_mb_release_context() is the wrong thing to call
here since we are still actually using the allocation context.

Instead, just error out. We could retry the allocation, but there is a
possibility of getting stuck in an infinite loop instead, so this seems
safer.

[ Fixed up so we don't return EAGAIN to userspace. --tytso ]

Fixes: 8556e8f3b6 ("ext4: Don't allow new groups to be added during block allocation")
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c |   17 +++--------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -2897,7 +2897,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_
 		ext4_error(sb, "Allocating blocks %llu-%llu which overlap "
 			   "fs metadata", block, block+len);
 		/* File system mounted not to panic on error
-		 * Fix the bitmap and repeat the block allocation
+		 * Fix the bitmap and return EUCLEAN
 		 * We leak some of the blocks here.
 		 */
 		ext4_lock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group);
@@ -2906,7 +2906,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_
 		ext4_unlock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group);
 		err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bitmap_bh);
 		if (!err)
-			err = -EAGAIN;
+			err = -EUCLEAN;
 		goto out_err;
 	}
 
@@ -4476,18 +4476,7 @@ repeat:
 	}
 	if (likely(ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_FOUND)) {
 		*errp = ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(ac, handle, reserv_clstrs);
-		if (*errp == -EAGAIN) {
-			/*
-			 * drop the reference that we took
-			 * in ext4_mb_use_best_found
-			 */
-			ext4_mb_release_context(ac);
-			ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group = 0;
-			ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start = 0;
-			ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len = 0;
-			ac->ac_status = AC_STATUS_CONTINUE;
-			goto repeat;
-		} else if (*errp) {
+		if (*errp) {
 			ext4_discard_allocated_blocks(ac);
 			goto errout;
 		} else {