linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.6 05/56] tcp: enable per-socket rate limiting of all challenge acks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160814202505.125744458@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 14 Aug 2016 22:37:09 +0200
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>, Yue Cao <ycao009@....edu>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.6 05/56] tcp: enable per-socket rate limiting of all challenge acks

4.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>

[ Upstream commit 083ae308280d13d187512b9babe3454342a7987e ]

The per-socket rate limit for 'challenge acks' was introduced in the
context of limiting ack loops:

commit f2b2c582e824 ("tcp: mitigate ACK loops for connections as tcp_sock")

And I think it can be extended to rate limit all 'challenge acks' on a
per-socket basis.

Since we have the global tcp_challenge_ack_limit, this patch allows for
tcp_challenge_ack_limit to be set to a large value and effectively rely on
the per-socket limit, or set tcp_challenge_ack_limit to a lower value and
still prevents a single connections from consuming the entire challenge ack
quota.

It further moves in the direction of eliminating the global limit at some
point, as Eric Dumazet has suggested. This a follow-up to:
Subject: [PATCH 4.6 05/56] tcp: make challenge acks less predictable

Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Cc: Yue Cao <ycao009@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3423,6 +3423,23 @@ static int tcp_ack_update_window(struct
 	return flag;
 }
 
+static bool __tcp_oow_rate_limited(struct net *net, int mib_idx,
+				   u32 *last_oow_ack_time)
+{
+	if (*last_oow_ack_time) {
+		s32 elapsed = (s32)(tcp_time_stamp - *last_oow_ack_time);
+
+		if (0 <= elapsed && elapsed < sysctl_tcp_invalid_ratelimit) {
+			NET_INC_STATS_BH(net, mib_idx);
+			return true;	/* rate-limited: don't send yet! */
+		}
+	}
+
+	*last_oow_ack_time = tcp_time_stamp;
+
+	return false;	/* not rate-limited: go ahead, send dupack now! */
+}
+
 /* Return true if we're currently rate-limiting out-of-window ACKs and
  * thus shouldn't send a dupack right now. We rate-limit dupacks in
  * response to out-of-window SYNs or ACKs to mitigate ACK loops or DoS
@@ -3436,21 +3453,9 @@ bool tcp_oow_rate_limited(struct net *ne
 	/* Data packets without SYNs are not likely part of an ACK loop. */
 	if ((TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq) &&
 	    !tcp_hdr(skb)->syn)
-		goto not_rate_limited;
-
-	if (*last_oow_ack_time) {
-		s32 elapsed = (s32)(tcp_time_stamp - *last_oow_ack_time);
+		return false;
 
-		if (0 <= elapsed && elapsed < sysctl_tcp_invalid_ratelimit) {
-			NET_INC_STATS_BH(net, mib_idx);
-			return true;	/* rate-limited: don't send yet! */
-		}
-	}
-
-	*last_oow_ack_time = tcp_time_stamp;
-
-not_rate_limited:
-	return false;	/* not rate-limited: go ahead, send dupack now! */
+	return __tcp_oow_rate_limited(net, mib_idx, last_oow_ack_time);
 }
 
 /* RFC 5961 7 [ACK Throttling] */
@@ -3463,9 +3468,9 @@ static void tcp_send_challenge_ack(struc
 	u32 count, now;
 
 	/* First check our per-socket dupack rate limit. */
-	if (tcp_oow_rate_limited(sock_net(sk), skb,
-				 LINUX_MIB_TCPACKSKIPPEDCHALLENGE,
-				 &tp->last_oow_ack_time))
+	if (__tcp_oow_rate_limited(sock_net(sk),
+				   LINUX_MIB_TCPACKSKIPPEDCHALLENGE,
+				   &tp->last_oow_ack_time))
 		return;
 
 	/* Then check host-wide RFC 5961 rate limit. */