[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160814202507.222971887@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 22:38:00 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.6 56/56] ext4: fix reference counting bug on block allocation error
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
commit 554a5ccc4e4a20c5f3ec859de0842db4b4b9c77e upstream.
If we hit this error when mounted with errors=continue or
errors=remount-ro:
EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used:2940: comm ext4.exe: Allocating blocks 5090-6081 which overlap fs metadata
then ext4_mb_new_blocks() will call ext4_mb_release_context() and try to
continue. However, ext4_mb_release_context() is the wrong thing to call
here since we are still actually using the allocation context.
Instead, just error out. We could retry the allocation, but there is a
possibility of getting stuck in an infinite loop instead, so this seems
safer.
[ Fixed up so we don't return EAGAIN to userspace. --tytso ]
Fixes: 8556e8f3b6 ("ext4: Don't allow new groups to be added during block allocation")
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 17 +++--------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -2939,7 +2939,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_
ext4_error(sb, "Allocating blocks %llu-%llu which overlap "
"fs metadata", block, block+len);
/* File system mounted not to panic on error
- * Fix the bitmap and repeat the block allocation
+ * Fix the bitmap and return EFSCORRUPTED
* We leak some of the blocks here.
*/
ext4_lock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group);
@@ -2948,7 +2948,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_
ext4_unlock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group);
err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bitmap_bh);
if (!err)
- err = -EAGAIN;
+ err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
goto out_err;
}
@@ -4513,18 +4513,7 @@ repeat:
}
if (likely(ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_FOUND)) {
*errp = ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(ac, handle, reserv_clstrs);
- if (*errp == -EAGAIN) {
- /*
- * drop the reference that we took
- * in ext4_mb_use_best_found
- */
- ext4_mb_release_context(ac);
- ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group = 0;
- ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start = 0;
- ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len = 0;
- ac->ac_status = AC_STATUS_CONTINUE;
- goto repeat;
- } else if (*errp) {
+ if (*errp) {
ext4_discard_allocated_blocks(ac);
goto errout;
} else {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists