[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160814222408.GE10501@katana>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 00:24:08 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Enric Balletbo <enric.balletbo@...labora.co.uk>,
Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@...omium.org>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"# 9798ac6d32c1 mfd : cros_ec : Add cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status helper"
<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] i2c: cros-ec-tunnel: Fix usage of
cros_ec_cmd_xfer()
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:37:18PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> cros_ec_cmd_xfer returns success status if the command transport
> completes successfully, but the execution result is incorrectly ignored.
> In many cases, the execution result is assumed to be successful, leading
> to ignored errors and operating on uninitialized data.
>
> We've recently introduced the cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() helper to avoid these
> problems. Let's use it.
>
> [Regarding the 'Fixes' tag; there is significant refactoring since the driver's
> introduction, but the underlying logical error exists throughout I believe]
>
> Fixes: 9d230c9e4f4e ("i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver")
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 9798ac6d32c1 mfd: cros_ec: Add cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() helper
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Applied to for-current, thanks!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists