[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57B11DAB.6080904@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:40:59 +0800
From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
"'Kirill A . Shutemov'" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mem-hotplug: introduce movablenode option
On 2016/8/12 7:13, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 19:23:54 +0800 Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch introduces a new boot option movablenode.
>>
>> To support memory hotplug, boot option "movable_node" is needed. And to
>> support debug memory hotplug, boot option "movable_node" and "movablenode"
>> are both needed.
>>
>> e.g. movable_node movablenode=1,2,4
>
> I have some naming concerns. "movable_node" and "movablenode" is just
> confusing and ugly.
>
Hi Andrew,
OK, how about other two fix patches?
Thanks,
Xishi Qiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists