[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160815090755.GA1426@svinekod>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:07:55 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, keescook@...omium.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: apply __ro_after_init to some objects
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:53:03PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:43:45 +0100 Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 04:01:11PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
> > > index 10ad8ab..c1ff7c2 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
> > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > > */
> > >
> > > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > +#include <linux/cache.h>
> > > #include <linux/clocksource.h>
> > > #include <linux/elf.h>
> > > #include <linux/err.h>
> >
> > Nit: Could you please sort this list? Everything but <linux/kernel.h> is
> > already in order.
[...]
> Thanks a lot, all comments are addressed in v4.
>
> the headers in vdso.c is sorted now. However, the headers in mmu.c,
> dma-mapping.c, init.c aren't, for I dunno whether it's acceptable
> to do so. Or we could add one separate patch to make them sorted before
> applying __ro_after_init
Ah. Given that's a little messy, it's probably not worthwhile sorting them.
Further, feel free to not bother sorting the vdso.c includes.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists