[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACna6ryuN_qDrVwAbS5P9mfhjMwv2hNeTqEzTQ=WxvP1V=zHXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:52:17 +0200
From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@...adcom.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM BRCM80211 IEEE802.11n WIRELESS DRIVER"
<brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX PATCH 1/2] brcmfmac: Check rtnl_lock is locked when
removing interface
On 15 August 2016 at 12:57, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com> writes:
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
>>
>> Fixes: a63b09872c1d ("brcmfmac: delete interface directly in code that sent fw request")
>> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>>
>> Kalle: I'm acking this as bugfix for 4.8 release.
>
> Ok. I'll wait few days for more comments before I apply this.
Sure.
> (I assume you are talking only about patch 1)
Yes, I'll leave mutex vs. spinlock to the experts :)
--
Rafał
Powered by blists - more mailing lists