linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] backlight-tosa: Delete owner assignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160815134612.GH25844@dell>
Date:	Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:46:12 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Janitors List <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight-tosa: Delete owner assignment

On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Vegard Nossum wrote:

> On 15 August 2016 at 13:12, SF Markus Elfring
> <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:03:29 +0200
> >
> > The field "owner" is set by core. Thus delete an extra initialisation.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just a small nit on the patch title: "delete owner assignment" is
> virtually useless as a title because it has no meaning without the
> broader context and only describes the literal change. It's like
> naming a patch "add a line" or "change the code"; it serves no
> purpose.
> 
> How about "backlight-tosa: delete _unnecessary_ assignment"? This
> immediately communicates the reason for/intent of the patch (there is
> unnecessary code, thus we can simplify it).

  backlight-tosa: Do not manually assign THIS_MODULE to .owner

  This is unnecessary because ...

> (Sorry about singling out this patch and the apparent bikeshedding,
> this comment obviously applies to a lot of patches by a lot of
> authors!)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Vegard

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog