[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1471221412.27272.76.camel@aj.id.au>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:06:52 +0930
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] pinctrl: Add core pinctrl support for Aspeed SoCs
On Sat, 2016-08-13 at 10:58 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 15:18 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >
> > I would probably prefer that option (introduce another field)
> > but you should make the overall decision, it's no strong opinion
> > from my side.
> >
> > >
> > > Would it be acceptable to document that requirement?
> It might make it a bit less nasty (and easier to change later on
> if necessary) to use some kind of:
>
> bool ast_signal_is_gpio(...)
>
> And stick the strcmp in there.
Yep, I'll do so for v2.
Cheers,
Andrew
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists