[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160815093243.4576258a@lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:32:43 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, daniel.thompson@...aro.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
marc.zyngier@....com, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kprobes: Document jprobes stack copying
limitations
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:49:36 -0400
David Long <dave.long@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 08/15/2016 10:25 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:24:44 -0400
> > David Long <dave.long@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Some architectures (i.e.: sparc64 and arm64) make reasonable partial stack
> >> duplication for jprobes problematic. Document this.
> >
> > Applied to the docs tree, thanks.
> >
> > jon
> >
>
> Was kind of hoping to see an ack (or critique) from a sparc maintainer.
So are you saying you don't want the patch applied at this point?
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists