lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lgzyau7c.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:11:03 +0200
From:	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc:	"devel\@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Drivers: hv: vmbus: make bus ids in sysfs persistent

KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com> writes:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@...hat.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:17 AM
>> To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
>> Cc: devel@...uxdriverproject.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Haiyang Zhang
>> <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Drivers: hv: vmbus: make bus ids in sysfs persistent
>> 
>> KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com> writes:
>> 
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@...hat.com]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 1:46 AM
>> >> To: devel@...uxdriverproject.org
>> >> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Haiyang Zhang
>> >> <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
>> >> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Drivers: hv: vmbus: make bus ids in sysfs
>> >> persistent
>> >>
>> >> Bus ids for VMBus devices in /sys/bus/vmbus/devices/ are not
>> >> guaranteed to be persistent across reboot or kernel restart and this
>> >> causes problems for some tools. E.g. kexec tools use these ids to identify
>> NIC on kdump.
>> >> Fix the issue by using relid from channel offer as the unique id
>> >> instead of an auto incremented counter.
>> >
>> > Relids are not persistent. It is only valid between a channel offer
>> > message and a relid released message (or an unload or initiate contact
>> > message, which invalidates all channels). This is an opaque number
>> > that the root generates and uses to track channels. There is no
>> > guarantee that the same type of channel (networking, storage, etc)
>> > will get the same relid on each reboot.
>> >
>> 
>> Thanks for the info,
>> 
>> can we use device_id (offermsg.offer.if_instance.b) instead?
>
> I think you could; I am going to verify and get back to you on this.

Thanks!

> Sometime back I removed all the non-determinism in the vmbus device
> ID generation. Now, the current scheme of generating the device IDs does
> result in persistent IDs across boot (as long as the host presents the devices
> to the guest in the same order across boots). Do you have this fix?

Yes, I think I do. The issue I'm trying to address happens rearly on
kdump when we get devices present to us in a different order.

-- 
  Vitaly

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ