lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160815181754.GA9918@lst.de>
Date:	Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:17:54 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix secure erase

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:16:30PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> This really should be a:
>>
>> 	if (req_op(rq) != req_op(pos))
>>
>> I'l lleave it up to Jens if he wants that in this patch or not, otherwise
>> I'll send an incremental patch.
>
> Let's get a v2 with that fixed up, it makes a big readability
> difference.

It's not just readbility, it's also a potential correctness issue.
Not sure if we'd hit it for other request types at the moment, but
we'd surely hit if people add more..

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ