lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:53:24 -0700
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: BUG and WARN kernel log levels

Hi,

So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:

#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
#define BUG() do { \
       printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \

Seems like it should have one?

Also, I think we might want to examine WARN() a bit... it doesn't have
a log level either, but only a fraction of callers set one:

$ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep -v KERN_ | wc -l
2735

$ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep KERN_ | wc -l
77

If I'm reading checkpatch.pl correctly, it doesn't warn about missing
log levels on WARN calls, but I think it should.

How do you think is best to clean this up?

Mainly, I'd like to add a format string to BUG, or introduce a new
BUGish call that takes a format...

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ