[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2lgzxafdh.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:31:22 -0500
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.7 00/41] 4.7.1-stable review
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 06:44:02PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-rc boot: 468 boots: 1 failed, 432 passed with 33 offline, 2 conflicts (v4.7-41-g57464803070d)
>>
>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.7-41-g57464803070d/
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.7-41-g57464803070d/
>>
>> Tree: stable-rc
>> Branch: local/linux-4.7.y
>> Git Describe: v4.7-41-g57464803070d
>> Git Commit: 57464803070db4979012aba1322f675d42a5c280
>> Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>> Tested: 85 unique boards, 21 SoC families, 35 builds out of 143
>>
>> Boot Failure Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.7-41-g57464803070d&fail
>>
>> arm:
>>
>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y:
>> sun5i-r8-chip: 1 failed lab
>
> Is this boot failure to be expected for the 4.7 tree?
Nope, but I re-tried it and it seems to be working fine, so it can be
considered a PASS.
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists