linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 19/58] staging: lustre: llite: add md_op_data parameter to ll_get_dir

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1608152239170.7973@casper.infradead.org>
Date:	Mon, 15 Aug 2016 22:40:29 +0100 (BST)
From:	James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
	Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
	wang di <di.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/58] staging: lustre: llite: add md_op_data parameter
 to ll_get_dir_page


> > From: wang di <di.wang@...el.com>
> > 
> > Pass in struct md_op_data for ll_get_dir_page function.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: wang di <di.wang@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/7043
> > Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3531
> > Reviewed-by: John L. Hammond <john.hammond@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jinshan Xiong <jinshan.xiong@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/dir.c          |    8 ++++----
> >  .../staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_internal.h   |    4 ++--
> >  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/statahead.c    |   15 +++++++++++----
> >  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> This patch fails to apply, so I have to stop here in the patch series.
> 
> So I'm guesing your second patch series also will fail to apply, so can
> you resend all of the outstanding patches you have sent me after
> rebasing on my staging-testing branch?

Do you mind if I combine them into one series? Also I have a few more 
patches I like to include. Is it okay to add those as well?