[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fab1a3ec-5252-3ca7-6382-15b84a19ccdb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:15:55 +1000
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/13] kexec_file: Change kexec_add_buffer to take
kexec_buf as argument.
On 16/08/16 00:49, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Am Montag, 15 August 2016, 17:30:49 schrieb Balbir Singh:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 08:08:07PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>>> Adapt all callers to the new function prototype.
>>
>> Could you please expand on this?
>
> Is the following better?
>
> Adapt all callers to set up a kexec_buf to pass to kexec_add_buffer.
Yes and the reason for doing so? Consolidation/clarity of implementation?
>
>> Looks good otherwise
>>
>> Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
>
> Thank you for reviewing this series!
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists