[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160816073826.GB9927@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:38:26 +0300
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rajaram R <rajaram.officemail@...il.com>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/2] USB Type-C Connector class
Hi guys,
Sorry for the long silence. I just returned from paternal leave.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:19:25AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 09:23 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > I'm not going to take this series until everyone agrees on it,
> > sorry.
> > > I'll wait for you and Guenter and Oliver to all come up with a
> > solution
> > > that works for everyone.
> > >
> >
> > I have not heard from Heikko for a while. There have been some
> > follow-up
> > patches in
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git/log/?h=bxt-typec-pd-fixes
> >
> > but I am not really sure where this is going. I've been wondering if I
> > can/should get more actively involved and start driving the series if
> > Heikki is busy. Thoughts, anyone ?
>
> It is not clear to me where we were. It seems to me that we found
> the API good but disagreed about locking. Does that sum it up?
I'll remove the locks and resend.
Thanks,
--
heikki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists