[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFy2WxyUwYOx0SZiOc6PmG83XfW1uDznEM4mW0HpBf3Bvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 17:50:24 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [xfs] 68a9f5e700: aim7.jobs-per-min -13.6% regression
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
>
> Same in 4.7 (flat profile numbers climbed higher after this
> snapshot was taken, as can be seen by the callgraph numbers):
Ok, so it's not the zone-vs-node thing. It's just that nobody has
looked at that load in recent times.
Where "recent" may be years, of course.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists