[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160816100236.GF1751@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:02:36 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephen Just <stephenjust@...il.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ica.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] power: surface3_power: MSHW0011 rev-eng
implementation
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 05:49:26PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> +static const struct i2c_device_id mshw0011_id[] = {
> + { "MSHW0011:00", 0 },
You should not use ACPI device names in non-ACPI matching table. I think
you can just leave this table empty.
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, mshw0011_id);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists